• MSN
  • Hotmail
  • More
    • Autos
    • My MSN
    • Video
    • Careers & Jobs
    • Personals
    • Weather
    • Delish
    • Quotes
    • White Pages
    • Games
    • Real Estate
    • Wonderwall
    • Horoscopes
    • Shopping
    • Yellow Pages
    • Local Edition
    • Traffic
    • Feedback
    • Maps & Directions
    • Travel
    • Full MSN Index
  • Bing
  • msnbc.com sites & shows:
  • TODAY
  • Rock Center
  • Nightly News
  • Meet the Press
  • Dateline
  • Morning Joe
  • Hardball
  • Ed
  • Maddow
  • Last Word
  • msnbc tv
  • Home
  • US
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech & science
  • Travel
  • Local
  • Weather
Advertise | AdChoices
  • Recommended: Pakistan blocks Twitter over 'blasphemous content' -- but fails to stop tweets
  • Recommended: NATO summit prompts little buzz on streets of Kabul
  • Recommended: Death of Lockerbie bomber al-Megrahi 'doesn't close the book'
  • Recommended: 'Massacre': At least 90 killed as bomber targets military parade rehearsal in Yemen
First for breaking news and analysis: Compelling world news stories from msnbc.com and NBC News journalists. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook.
  • ↓ About this blog
  • ↓ Archives
    • Icons Email E-mail updates
    • Icons Twitter Follow on Twitter
    • Icons Feed Subscribe to RSS
  • 3
    days
    ago

    Leon Panetta seeks another $70M for Israel's 'Iron Dome' rocket shield

    By msnbc.com staff and news services

    WASHINGTON -- The Pentagon will seek to provide Israel with an additional $70 million in the coming months for its short-range rocket shield, known as the "Iron Dome," Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said after a meeting with his Israeli counterpart on Thursday.

    So far, the United States has provided $205 million to support the Iron Dome, manufactured by Israel's state-owned Raphael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd. The system uses small radar-guided missiles to blow up in midair Katyusha-style rockets with ranges of 3 miles to 45 miles, as well as mortar bombs.


    But top Republicans have criticized President Barack Obama for what they described as inadequate funding of U.S.-Israeli missile defense cooperation in his 2013 budget request released in February amid deficit-reduction requirements.

    Legislation moving through the Republican-controlled U.S. House of Representatives would give Israel additional $680 million for the Iron Dome system through 2015, and some House lawmakers are seeking a deal with Israel to share production of the Iron Dome system with U.S. weapons manufacturers.


    Follow @msnbc_world

    Obama's fiscal 2013 budget request calls for $3.1 billion in security assistance to Israel, part of a 10-year, $30 billion U.S. commitment, none of which was scheduled to fund Iron Dome.

    A message to Assad? 19 countries stage war games in Jordan

    On Thursday, Panetta said the Pentagon would seek additional funding for the Iron Dome program over the next three years "based on an annual assessment of Israeli security requirements."

    "My goal is to ensure Israel has the funding it needs each year to produce these batteries that can protect its citizens," Panetta said.

    'US Navy lit up the sky': Interceptor for Europe anti-missile shield tested

    He said the $70 million would be provided this fiscal year, which ends in September.

    "This is assistance that, provided Congress concurs, we can move quickly, to ensure no shortage in this important system," Panetta said in a statement after meeting Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak at the Pentagon.

    'Unbreakable bonds'
    The Jerusalem Post quoted Barak as saying that Israeli-U.S. defense ties had never been as strong as they were today under the Obama administration.

    "The U.S. decision to support further enhancing Israel's security is an important demonstration of the unbreakable bonds between the United States and Israel," Barak added. 

    The pro-Israel lobby group AIPAC welcomed Panetta's decision, saying it would help Israel better protect its citizens against some 60,000 missiles and rockets amassed at its borders by Hamas and Hezbollah Islamist militants.

    As of April, Israel had deployed three operating units of the system, which helped thwart Palestinian rocket salvos during a flare-up in fighting around the Gaza Strip in March. It has spoken of needing a total of 13 or 14 units to protect various fronts.

    The system intercepted more than 80 percent of the targets it engaged in March when nearly 300 rockets and mortars were fired at southern Israel, saving many lives, a U.S. Defense Department spokesman said on March 27.

    Reuters and msnbc.com staff contributed to this report.

    More world news from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • Inside Syria rebel stronghold: 'The city is on mute'
    • Video: Uncertainty breeds fear in Greece
    • Japan mayor: I wouldn't hire tattooed Gaga, Depp
    • Library opened by Mark Twain falls victim to cuts
    • China abuzz over reported N.Korea boat hijackings
    • What's behind China's crackdown on foreigners?
    • NBC's Ayman Mohyeldin answers Syria questions
    • Royal rumble: Spain's queen snubs UK queen
    • Germany's Pirate Party rides wave of popularity

    Follow us on Twitter: @msnbc_world

    340 comments

    Remind me, why do we care about Israel? Entangling alliances with Israel get the USA nowhere but poorer. The Israelis can pay for their own defensive systems, or they can pass around the collection plate in NYC's financial and diamond district -- funding defense the same way they funded the planting …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: israel, pentagon, military, shield, featured, leon-panetta, iron-dome
  • 4
    days
    ago

    Witnesses to Afghan massacre recount chilling scene


    Follow @msnbc_world
    By Jeff Black, msnbc.com

    Villagers who witnessed a massacre in southern Afghanistan that killed 17 civilians, including children, describe a chilling scene of screaming, gunfire and barking dogs in which a woman cried that her husband had been shot.

    In one of the few published interviews with witnesses to the massacre, a 14-year-old boy told McClatchy newspaper reporter Jon Stephenson that sounds of gunfire woke him in the early morning hours of March 11. The boy said saw a man with a weapon walk into a shed next to his house and shoot a cow.

    “I told the women inside our room: ‘Let’s run! Let’s get out of here,’” Rafiullah, who goes by one name, told the reporter.


     

    Military prosecutors allege that Staff Sgt. Robert Bales, accused of a deadly rampage which left 17 Afghan civilians dead, came in two waves, with Bales returning to his base after the first attack and then slipping out again. NBC's John Yang reports.

    Another apparent witness, Haji Mohammad Naim, said he awoke to barking dogs.

    “Then there was shooting, and the dogs stopped barking,” said Naim, reported to be in his 50s.

    A short time later, according to Stephenson's report, several frightened women and children entered Naim's yard in search of shelter. Moments later, a woman and young girl emerged, the woman screaming, "My husband has been martyred." 

    Naim said he was expecting a squad of soldiers but saw only one man, who he said started shooting at him.

    U.S. officials have charged Army Staff Sgt. Robert Bales with 17 counts of murder and six counts of attempted murder for the killings. The 38-year-old father of two, who was deployed three times to Iraq before going to Afghanistan, is in a solitary cell in the military prison at Leavenworth, Kansas, while he awaits trial.

    The defense attorney for Army Staff Sgt. Robert Bales, the soldier charged Friday with 17 counts of murder, has said the military lacks much of the physical evidence necessary to establish a solid case against his client. But prosecutors say there is ample evidence: surveillance video, shell casings and more. NBC's Jim Miklaszewski reports.

    Since the massacre, few independent accounts of the shooting have been reported. Other witnesses have said they saw more than one soldier that night.

    An 8-year-old Afghan boy who was wounded, Noorbinak, told Australian reporter Yalda Hakim that a man first shot his father’s dog and then shot his father and dragged his mother by her hair. He said one man entered the room and others were standing in the yard holding lights.

    The brother of a victim was quoted as also also seeing other soldiers.

    Emma Scanlan, an attorney with the law firm John Henry Browne and Associates that is defending Bales, told msnbc.com on Thursday that the Army has denied defense attorneys access to hospitalized witnesses in Afghanistan and stopped them from accompanying crimes scene investigators to the villages.

    “The defense investigation has been blocked at every turn and we have no idea what has been said or promised to these witnesses,” Scanlan said. “It is important to remember that the information we do have indicates that no one who was allegedly in the villages at the time of the shooting can identify our client.”

    Army officials have emphasized that Bales acted alone. The case remains in a sort of legal limbo over the question of Bales’s mental capacity. Browne has told his client not to take part in the Army’s “sanity board,” in which he is questioned by psychologists, calling it a “fishing expedition.”

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • Chicago braces for major protests as NATO summit looms
    • Estranged Kennedy wife died from hanging
    • Video: Firefighter plunges through burning roof
    • Immigration decision a plus for Klezmer tango band
    • LA suspends 7 cops for 'Jump Out Boys' clique

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

    44 comments

    Not willing short their chance to mass murder, the several Americans killed the farm animals and then killed the families. @Jrto77 you are an ignorant savage. The US will cover this up as they always do when guilty of war crimes.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: military, featured, witnesses, jeff-black, afghanistan-massacre, staff-sgt-robert-bales
  • 4
    days
    ago

    A message to Assad? 19 countries hold war games miles from Syrian border

    Staff Sgt. Wynn Hoke / Photo courtesy of U.S. Army

    Jordanian and United States parachutists navigate their way to a landing zone in Jordan on May 10 during Exercise Eager Lion 2012.

    By F. Brinley Bruton, msnbc.com, and NBC News

    A military exercise involving more than 11,000 troops from 19 countries is under way in Jordan, reportedly just miles from Syria's border.

    Dubbed Eager Lion 2012, the operation is "very significant," a source close to the Jordanian government told NBC News, adding it was the first of its kind in 15 years "in terms of size and importance."

    The source and an analyst both said the war games should be seen as a message to neighboring Syria's rulers.

    Violence has raged in Syria for 14 months after mass protests turned into an insurrection against President Bashar al-Assad's rule. Assad's government has repeatedly accused foreign states of backing a "terrorist" campaign in Syria, an apparent reference to Gulf powers Saudi Arabia and Qatar which have argued that Syrian insurgents should be supplied with weapons.

    Inside Syrian rebel stronghold: 'It is as if the city is on mute'

    A month-old truce brokered by international mediator Kofi Annan has failed to stop the violence, which has killed more than 9,000, according to U.N. figures. It has also caused a refugee crisis in the region.

    Another source close to the government in Jordan told NBC News that while some of the exercises were being held near the Royal Jordanian Air Force's King Feisal Al Jafr airbase in the south, other exercises were under way near the Syrian and Iraqi borders in the east. The sources spoke to NBC News on condition of anonymity.  

    Majed Jaber / Reuters

    U.S. Major General Ken Tovo (left), commanding general of the Special Operations Command Central, and Major General Awni El-Edwan, chief of staff of Jordanian Army's operations and training, address a joint news conference in Jordan on Tuesday.

    Experts in the region said the exercises were most certainly more than just building bridges between different countries. 

    Report: Syria rebels get better weapons as US boosts support

    "You can't honestly say that there is not a message when you get 19 nations together in multilateral force less than 50 miles away from the Syrian border," Michael Stephens of London-based military and security think tank RUSI told msnbc.com from Qatar. 

    "There is no possible reason as to why the Americans wouldn't want a joint operation held close to Syria," he added. "It enhances deterrence (and) the Americans could've quietened it down if they wanted to."

    Media reports in Jordan claimed that the exercises were a message not only to Syria but Iran. 

    Syria violence spills into streets of Lebanon's Tripoli

    However, American and Jordanian military officials strenuously denied that there were operations taking place close to Syria.  

    "It's not about Syria, it's just a pure coincidence," U.S. Central Command Maj. Robert Bockholt told msnbc.com from Jordan. "Eager Lion 12 has been pre-planned."

    The personnel from 19 nations -- Australia, Bahrain, Brunei, Egypt, France, Italy, Iraq, Jordan, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Lebanon, Pakistan, Qatar, Spain, Romania, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom and United States -- were working together "to build functional capacity and enhance readiness," according to a statement from the combined operation, Task Force Spartan.  

    The exercise "does not target anyone -- none of the neighboring or world countries," Major Gen. Awni El-Edwan, Jordanian Armed Forces operations and training chief of staff, told journalists on Tuesday.

    Reuters contributed to this report. 

    More world news from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • Inside Syria rebel stronghold: 'The city is on mute'
    • What's behind China's crackdown on foreigners?
    • NBC's Ayman Mohyeldin answers Syria questions
    • Royal rumble: Spain's queen snubs UK queen
    • Italian university to switch to English-only classes
    • Germany's Pirate Party rides wave of popularity
    • 'Scapegoated'? Westerners held over massacre
    • Anxious Greeks withdraw $894 million in a day
    • In China, English teaching is a whites-only club
    • Beer-swilling bride sparks controversy in New Zealand
    • Oh la la! A look at France's fascinating first ladies

    Follow us on Twitter: @msnbc_world

     

     

    44 comments

    Run around and play in the sand all you want, but the US needs to stay out of the mess in Syria. Let the other Arab nations handle it. No matter what happens, some of those people will blame the US for either helping or for not helping.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: military, syria, jordan, exercise, assad, featured, rusi, eager-lion
  • 7
    days
    ago

    Incoming! Clueless campers disrupt live-fire military exercises

    By Jeff Black, msnbc.com

    A group of die-hard campers who passed through barriers and ignored warnings of live-fire military drills as they tried to locate the ideal spot to pitch their tent may have to pay for their folly.

    Over the weekend, Sweden’s Marine Regiment of Vaxholm was launching live mortar rounds at its wilderness firing range when a car was reported in the area, according to a translation of an article on the Dalarnas Tidning newspaper website.

    As is customary in such military exercises, the military operation was cordoned off with barriers and explicit warning signs on the road. But that didn’t deter the campers, who were reportedly tourists from the Stockholm area. They continued their trek to a wind shelter. That's where service members found the three campers, who said they were planning to go fishing.

    According to a security officer for the firing range, the campers said they had read the warning signs but concluded it “probably was not that bad.”

    The drill had to be halted because of the intrusion. A helicopter was called in to transport the campers out of the area, who were then taken to local police. The campers were not named.

    Swedish military officials were not amused. They vowed to charge the trio for flying them to safety as well as for the disruption of the military drills.

    More world news from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • Vatican allows mobster to be exhumed as cops seek clues in teen's disappearance
    • Mexico's drug war: No sign of 'light at the end of the tunnel'
    • Troops capture senior Kony commander
    • Palestinian prisoners agree to end hunger strike

    Follow us on Twitter: @msnbc_world

    10 comments

    Should have just kept firing morter rounds. Thin the herd. Maybe they would have caught on. I'm sure the fishing is great at a "live fire" morter range. Surprised they weren't French.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: sweden, military, campers
  • 11
    May
    2012
    3:42pm, EDT

    Outrage, calls for action over anti-Muslim materials in military training

    Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey, right, talks to reporters alongside Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta at the Pentagon in April. Commenting on a military training class containing anti-Islam sentiments, Dempsey on Thursday called the course "totally objectionable."

     

    By Kari Huus, msnbc.com

    Emerging details of inflammatory anti-Islam materials used in U.S. military training have prompted a chorus of outrage from civil rights and American Muslim groups, and growing demands for the dismissal of military leaders associated with the course, and for other actions to address the issue.

    The materials, first detailed by Wired.com, used in an elective course at the Joint Forces Staff College in Norfolk, Va., promoted "total war" against Muslims in order to stave off terrorism. The course, "Perspectives on Islam and Islamic Radicalism," raised the option of "taking war to a civilian population," in disregard of the Geneva Convention of 1949, and possibly destruction of Mecca and Medina, Islam’s holiest sites.

    "This is Abu Ghraib by power point and lectern," said Mikey Weinstein, president of the nonprofit Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF), referring to the scandal that erupted in 2004 after the surfacing of torrid pictures of U.S. troops abusing prisoners in Iraq. "It’s even worse than Abu Ghraib. What they are talking about is essentially genocide," of Muslims.


    The military announced a review of its training materials and canceled the "Perspectives" course in late April. The action came after an FBI review resulted in the elimination of reams of materials that were found to be discriminatory against Muslims, treating the whole population with suspicion.

    The details coming to light from the the 8-week course at an elite military institution — taught to officers since 2004 — have shocked even those who have long complained about discrimination against Muslims.


    Follow @msnbc_us

    Kari Huus


    Follow Kari Huus on Twitter and Facebook.



    Instructor Lt. Col. Matthew Dooley, the main focus of the criticism, taught that the Geneva Conventions that set standards of armed conflict are "no longer relevant."

    Click here for a slideshow from the course published by Wired magazine.

    "This would leave open the option once again of taking war to a civilian population wherever necessary (the historical precedents of Dresden, Tokyo, Hiroshima, Nagasaki being applicable...)."

    Dooley’s materials mock the notion of "moderate Muslims." He taught that the growing number of mosques and Islamic centers in the United States would generate more adherents to use "violent jihad" in pursuit of Islamic domination.

    The course materials admit that the actions and views included will not be seen as "politically correct."

    Indeed, the courses contradict U.S. government positions — as represented internally and to U.S. allies in Afghanistan, Iraq and elsewhere — that while the country is fighting Islamic extremists, it is not at war with the religion or its adherents as a whole.

    On Thursday, the Chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey called the course "totally objectionable" and "against our values."

    Dempsey told reporters at the Pentagon that Lt. Col. Dooley was no longer teaching, but has kept his job at the college, a top post-graduate professional military institution that serves students from around the world.

    Among the organizations calling for Dooley’s dismissal from the college is the Council on American Islamic Relations.

    "It is imperative that those who taught our future military leaders to wage war not just on our terrorist enemy, but on the faith of Islam itself be held accountable," wrote CAIR national executive director Nihad Awad in a letter to Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta. "These shocking revelations are completely out of line with the longstanding values of one of our nation’s most respected institutions."

    The Arab American Anti-Discrimination Committee is urging the Pentagon to recall and retrain military personnel who have been subjected to the anti-Islam material.

    "It’s very troubling,” Abed Ayoub, ADC legal director, told msnbc.com. "You’re sending American soldiers overseas with these trainings and these biases ... I think there definitely should be a study as to what impact these trainings have had on their actions."

    Weinstein, from MRFF, asserts that Dooley and others in his chain of command who knew about the course materials or should have known about the material should face court-martial.

    "MRFF calls for the immediate dismissal of Lt. Col. Dooley, as well as an immediate condemnation, deeply probing investigation, and swift trial by courts-martial of those responsible for allowing content advocating genocide to be used to indoctrinate future leaders within the U.S. armed forces," he told msnbc.com.

    MRFF has filed request under the Freedom of Information Act seeking to surface all communication and documentation about the Perspectives course. Weinstein, a former Air Force judge advocate general, or JAG, and lawyer in the Reagan White House, believes the course is merely a symptom of a larger problem. In recent years he has campaigned against the military’s invitation of speakers that are known for virulent anti-Islam views.

    "This is simply a small cancer cell that is rapidly metastasizing," he said. "This is representative of a larger more sinister force which is fundamentalist Christianity."

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • 'Tripawed' the 3-legged grizzly returns to Denali
    • Video: Pier collapses during prom photo shoot
    • Cities: Occupy protests cost taxpayers millions
    • Plastic card makes landfall in Alaska after 33-year sea voyage
    • Houston reporter fired for stripping files discrimination complaint
    • Suspected kidnapper dead, 2 girls found unharmed
    • Son defies odds to walk into returning soldier's arms

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

    Follow Kari Huus on Facebook

    1678 comments

    I really don't care. So sick of the PC bs anyway. How are the Islamist militants being taught?

    Show more
    Explore related topics: military, featured, islam, muslim, kari-huus
  • 10
    May
    2012
    7:16am, EDT

    'Frustrated': Dad of Taliban prisoner Bowe Bergdahl takes matters into own hands

    IntelCenter / AFP - Getty Images

    This image taken from a Taliban video and provided by IntelCenter on December 7, 2010, appears to show U.S. soldier Bowe Bergdahl.

    By msnbc.com news services

    WASHINGTON -- The father of Bowe Bergdahl, a U.S. soldier held prisoner by the Taliban since 2009, is so frustrated that more than a year of covert diplomacy has been unable to free his son that he is learning the Pashto language so he can contact militants directly.

    Speaking out about his son's case after a long silence, UPS worker Bob Bergdahl urged President Barack Obama's administration to push harder for his release. 


    The soldier's father added that he intends to take matters into his own hands, studying Pashto -- the language spoken in southern Afghanistan -- reaching out to regional experts and contacting the media-savvy Taliban through its website.

    "I feel that I have to do my job as his father," he said. "I'm working toward a diplomatic and humanitarian solution."

    Bob Berghdal said he and his wife Jani are disappointed their son, now 26, remains in danger after almost three years of captivity.

    "We believe that Bowe's specific situation is not being addressed," Bergdahl told Reuters in an interview.

    Peace talks suspended
    The missing serviceman's fate is tied up in U.S. efforts to broker a peace deal between the Taliban and the Afghan government, a high-level, high-risk diplomatic initiative which appeared to be on the cusp of a breakthrough before the Taliban suspended preliminary talks in March.

    In a separate interview with the Idaho Mountain Express, Bob Bergdahl said there was "a dynamic here that has to change."

    "Everybody is frustrated with how slowly the process has evolved," he added. 

    Report: Secret US program releases Afghan insurgents

    Bob Bergdahl told the newspaper that swapping Taliban prisoners at Guantanamo for his son represents a "win-win" for the United States. He said in addition to his son's safe return, the United States could foster good will with the Afghan people.

    Bergdahl, of Hailey, Idaho, was stationed in Paktika province, a hotbed of militant activity, when he disappeared in unclear circumstances on June 30, 2009. He is believed to be held by the Haqqani network, an insurgent group affiliated with the Taliban, probably somewhere in Pakistan.

    April 7, 2010: Rachel Maddow reports the breaking news of a video released by the Taliban which they claim is captured U.S. soldier Pfc. Bowe Bergdahl.

    The family appears even more frustrated that prospects for progress seem to have dimmed in Washington, where the idea of negotiating with the shadowy militant group has exposed the White House to political attack in the run-up to the presidential elections.

    For months, U.S. negotiators were seeking to arrange the transfer of five Taliban detainees held at Guantanamo Bay military prison to the Gulf state of Qatar. The transfer was intended as one of a series of confidence-building measures designed to open the door to political talks between the Taliban and Afghan President Hamid Karzai's government.

    US offers 'safe passage' to Afghan Taliban leaders

    That move -- at the center of U.S. strategy for ending the long, costly conflict in Afghanistan -- was also supposed to lead directly to Bowe's release. The Taliban has consistently called for the United States to release those held at Guantanamo Bay in exchange for freeing Western prisoners.

    Dec. 25, 2009: The family of Pfc. Bowe Bergdahl pleaded for the release of their son after the Taliban released a video of the infantryman in captivity. CNBC's Carl Quintanilla reports.

    The Guantanamo transfer proposal, which would have required notification to Congress, ground to a halt when the Taliban rejected U.S. conditions designed to ensure transferred Taliban would not slip away and re-emerge as military leaders.

    While most American officials do not expect that proposal to be taken up again in earnest in the months leading up to the Nov. 6 presidential election, they are exploring alternative steps they hope might rekindle the process.

    The prospect of a quick start to peace talks grows more unlikely just as questions mount about what the West, after over 10 years of war in Afghanistan, will be able to accomplish before NATO withdraws most of its troops at the end of 2014.

    From the start, the Guantanamo transfer plan drew fire from politicians on Capitol Hill who, according to U.S. law, would have had to closely examine the proposal. The criticism came not just from leading Republicans, but also from some Democrats.

    Dec. 26, 2009: A new video of Private First Class Bowe Bergdahl has just been released, and as KTVB's Scott Evans reports, residents in the soldier's hometown of Hailey, Idaho, are 'trying to stay positive."

    The Bergdahl family said it believes the opposition may have been too intense at a time when the administration is seeking to burnish Obama's national security credentials. "It doesn't seem like dialogue is even allowed" by Congress, Bergdahl said.

    Mitt Romney, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, also has rejected the proposed transfer. "We do not negotiate with terrorists," he said in December.

    'Too much risk'
    The imprisonment of suspected militants at Guantanamo is an irritant in U.S. relations with Muslim nations including Afghanistan, which has long demanded the release of its citizens held since shortly after the U.S. invasion that toppled the Taliban government in Kabul in 2001.

    Bob Bergdahl said he does not advocate an attempt to rescue his son by force. 

    "That's too much risk, for too many people," said Bergdahl, who described Bowe as a "soft-spoken," "compassionate" young man who, as a home-schooled youth, was a skilled outdoorsman drawn to martial arts and biking.

    A senior U.S. military official told The Associated Press that the Pentagon believes Bergdahl to be alive and in relatively good health. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because efforts to free Bergdahl remain sensitive.

    A senior Obama administration official, also speaking on condition of anonymity because of concerns for Bergdahl's safety, told reporters that the case has been a topic at each of several direct meetings that U.S. officials have held with the Taliban. Direct contact, once taboo for the United States, began in secret last year in hopes that the channel could speed larger peace talks with the Afghan government of President Hamid Karzai and ultimately end the long Taliban insurgency.

    The official said the U.S. hopes to revive the Bergdahl deal with the Taliban.

    July 19, 2009: The kidnapped man, 23-year-old Pfc. Bowe R. Bergdahl of Ketchum, Idaho, appears in a 28-minute video, telling his captors, "I'm scared." NBC's Jim Miklaszewski reports.

    Marine Col. David Lapan, spokesman for Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters that the military has a "collaborative" relationship with Bergdahl's family, which is given quarterly updates from Washington. He said the family is not advised on whether to discuss the case with the news media.

    "Our message to them is: We are working hard to obtain Sgt. Bergdahl's release, to bring him back into U.S. hands," Lapan said.

    Asked about the family's complaint that the U.S. government has not done enough, Lapan said: "It's perfectly understandable that parents whose son has been kept in captivity for several years now are frustrated. We certainly understand that. That's why we do everything thing we can to try to keep them updated, to the extent we can."

    He added: "If they are angry and/or frustrated, that is certainly understandable. I would say that our leaders are frustrated as well."

    The last time the Bergdahls saw their son was the Christmas holiday of 2008, when he came home from his military service just months before shipping out to Afghanistan.

    To solicit support for further action, Bob Bergdahl plans to speak at an annual demonstration to recognize prisoners of war over Memorial Day weekend in Washington. The event, organized by the nonprofit POW support group Rolling Thunder, typically attracts more than 100,000 motorcyclists to the nation's capital.

    Reuters and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

    More world news from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • In debt or jobless, many Italians choose suicide
    • Reporting on the hidden horror of Britain's sex gangs
    • Video: Would-be al-Qaida bomber was double agent
    • Study: Plastic in 'Great Pacific Garbage Patch' increases 100-fold
    • US charity's gift to UK troops: $2 million for 'sanctuary'
    • $868K mystery: Nigeria stock exchange's yacht, Rolexes vanish
    • UK jails 9 members of sex gang who 'shared' teen girls

    Follow us on Twitter: @msnbc_world


    254 comments

    We have a young service member in harms way, our prayers are with him. We need our Military to step up to the plate, and find this kid and bring him home. We do not leave POW's behind. that is what he is a POW. Maybe he made a bad decision, but so what, he is still an American that deserves to come  …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: afghanistan, pakistan, taliban, military, diplomacy, featured, bowe-bergdahl
  • 9
    May
    2012
    3:52am, EDT

    Fisher House offers gift to UK's wounded troops: $2 million toward 'sanctuary'

    courtesy Hawkins family

    Former British Royal Marine Ed Hawkins was seriously injured in Afghanistan in 2010. He left hospital last year and is currently on a work placement.

    By Alastair Jamieson, msnbc.com

    LONDON -- Fisher House, the Maryland-based charity which provides overnight accommodation for families visiting hospitalized military members, is expanding onto foreign soil for the first time with a facility for British troops.

    Construction has begun on a $6.8-million building with 18 en-suite rooms that will allow relatives to stay close to the Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Birmingham, where the U.K.'s most seriously wounded military personnel are treated.


    As well as providing servicemen and women a place to relax away from hospital wards, it will have communal living space including a family room, play area, lounge and kitchen and a private garden.

    Fisher House, which was founded during the first Gulf War in 1990, has more than 50 projects in the U.S., as well as others located on American bases in Germany. However, this is its first truly international venture.

    'Unique American model'
    Talk show host and former U.S. Marine Montel Williams and the charity’s chairman, Ken Fisher, attended a ground-breaking ceremony at the site.

    Courtesy Fisher House

    Montel Williams at the ground-breaking ceremony for the new Fisher House project at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Birmingham, England, on April 23.

    "This is a great honor for Fisher House, as we share with our British brothers and sisters our unique American model for caring for military families," Fisher said.

    "This will be a sanctuary for the people who need it most: those who have made deep personal sacrifices – whether on the battlefield or on the home front – to keep us safe.  We thank them even though we know it will never be enough."

    Almost 10,000 British troops are in combat alongside 90,000 U.S. personnel in Afghanistan. Figures from Britain's Ministry of Defence, collated by The Guardian newspaper, show 832 have been seriously wounded since Operation Enduring Freedom began in 2001.

    Many families travel for hundreds of miles to be by their loved ones' bedside -- sometimes for weeks at a time, because of the need for months or even years of surgery and rehabilitation. Military accommodation exists for family members but only six bedrooms are available at Queen Elizabeth Hospital.

    Jan. 25: There are many of them around the country and they're all called Fisher House — a place for wounded war veterans to recover with the love and support of their families close by. NBC's Ann Curry reports.

    Sue Hawkins, whose son Ed was almost killed by an improvised explosive device while on a patrol in Afghanistan in May 2010, said the new facility would "be a great source of comfort, particularly at a time when families are surrounded by so much uncertainty."

    The blast killed his corporal and seriously wounded Ed, who was serving with the Royal Marines. He was flown back to Birmingham for several months of treatment.

    "When we were told about Ed, we just left for the hospital," Sue Hawkins told msnbc.com. "We had no idea how long we would be there or even if he would survive. I can remember everything about that day, because of the shock, but that last thing you have time to think about it is planning where to stay."

    Five-hour round trip
    Faced with a daily five-hour round trip from their home in Hampshire, Sue and her husband Michael spent many nights across the road from the hospital in a former nurses' accommodation block, before moving to the military facility – a converted house in a residential street.


    Follow @msnbc_world

    "There were times when Ed became very distressed and we were able to reach him quickly when the hospital called," she said. "That sort of comfort and care is very important. We know first-hand how important it is to have a 'home from home' in difficult, emotional and challenging times. Fisher House truly is a massive step in the best direction possible.”

    Ed Hawkins, who is now 26, left hospital last year and is currently on a work placement.

    British soldier Nick Gibbons, who lost a leg in a bomb in Afghanistan in 2008, also attended the ground-breaking ceremony on April 23. He told ITV News: "It's what you need really, your family around you. Facilities like this are great because it not only allows the family to stay here, it gives you a better relationship with your family. It's a stressful time. The last thing you want is them travelling."

    Fisher House has contributed $2 million to the project, with the rest of the building cost provided by U.K. veterans' charity Help for Heroes, whose high-profile supporters include Prince Harry. It will be operated by the Queen Elizabeth Hospital Charity and funded by Help for Heroes when it opens next year.

    Britain's Prince Harry charmed the crowds in Washington, D.C., where he was on hand to accept a humanitarian award for his work with wounded veterans. NBC's Kristen Welker reports.

    President Barack Obama and his wife Michelle have previously made a sizeable donation to Fisher House, which also operates a Hero Miles Program that uses donated frequent flyer miles to bring family members to the bedside of injured service members. 

    Montel Williams told the Birmingham Mail that he was a regular visitor to Fisher House sites in the U.S., cooking meals for soldiers and their families. "I'll definitely be coming to Birmingham to do the same," he told the newspaper. "I'll bring my sister and my chef with me and we'll rustle up things like crab cakes and fish. It'll be real American-style cooking."

    Msnbc.com's David Arnott contributed to this report.

     

    More world news from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • Study: Plastic in 'Great Pacific Garbage Patch' increases 100-fold
    • US charity's gift to UK troops: $2 million for 'sanctuary'
    • $868K mystery: Nigeria stock exchange's yacht, Rolexes vanish
    • UK jails 9 members of sex gang who 'shared' teen girls
    • Heathrow chaos: Travelers spend longer in line than on jets
    • Leak hits Shell Nigeria pipeline at center of environmental case
    • Story of vengeful jilted dentist WAS too good to be true
    • Poll: Most Egyptians think US aid billions have 'negative effect'
    • London jogger: Dustin Hoffman 'saved my life'

    Follow us on Twitter: @msnbc_world


    81 comments

    A feel good story to start the morning, thank you. I wish the soldiers and their families the best while going through their recovery, because family is everything in situations such as this. It's good to see there will be a place for this to happen. Great job Fisher House.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: us, afghanistan, military, featured, family, britain, giving, veterans, defense, troops
  • 5
    May
    2012
    12:16pm, EDT

    Long, winding road to Guantanamo arraignment

    By The Associated Press

    GUANTANAMO BAY NAVAL BASE, Cuba -- Held in a secret prison in Guantanamo that is under such tight security even its exact location on the base is classified, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and his co-defendants until Saturday had not been seen in public since a pretrial hearing the day after President Barack Obama's Jan. 21, 2009, inauguration. 

    Their arraignment Saturday also came more than three years after the Obama administration's failed effort to try the suspects in a federal civilian court and close the prison at the U.S. base in Cuba.

    Attorney General Eric Holder announced in 2009 that Mohammed and his co-defendants would be tried blocks from the site of the destroyed trade center in downtown Manhattan, but the plan was shelved after New York officials cited huge costs to secure the neighborhood and family opposition to trying the suspects in the U.S. 


    The men never entered formal pleas in previous hearings, but Mohammed had told the court that he would confess to planning the attacks "from A to Z" and hoped to be a "martyr."

    He dismissed the military justice system, saying, "After torturing, they transferred us to inquisition land in Guantanamo." 

    The arraignment is expected to be followed by a hearing on defense motions that challenge the charges and extreme secrecy rules imposed to prevent the release of information about U.S. counterterrorism methods and strategy. 

    New rules adopted by Congress and Obama forbid the use of testimony obtained through cruel treatment or torture. The defendants were held at secret CIA prisons overseas where they were subjected to what the government called "enhanced interrogation techniques." Mohammed was waterboarded 183 times, officials have said. 

    The American Civil Liberties Union filed a motion Friday asking the judge to prohibit the government's use of a 40-second delay and a white noise machine to prevent any spectators from hearing classified information, including details about the harsh treatment in the secret CIA detention sites overseas. 

    "If the defendants are unable to express themselves directly to the American public then how are we to know whether justice is being served," said ACLU director Anthony Romero. 

    Kenneth Roth, executive director of Human Rights Watch and a former federal prosecutor, say coerced testimony from witnesses is still admissible, even if it isn't from defendants, and the case would be better off in civilian court instead of being heard by a judge and jury panel picked by the Pentagon. 

    "There still are major problems in terms of whether the trial will be fair and, more important, will they be perceived as fair," Roth said. 

    The government has pledged to make the proceedings more transparent by broadcasting the hearing to families at U.S. military bases. News cameras, however, are still not permitted inside the courtroom, where the media and other observers are kept behind double-paned, soundproof glass. 

    Lawyers for the defendants had opposed the government's plan to show the hearings just to the families. 

    "We believe that the world needs to see what's happening," said Cheryl Bormann, a civilian attorney appointed to represent Walid bin Attash. 

    Prisoners now have access, at government expense, to civilian defense attorneys who specialize in complex death penalty cases. But human rights groups and defense lawyers still condemn the proceedings as flawed and fundamentally unfair. 

    Lawyers appointed to represent the men say they face hurdles they would never encounter in a civilian court, including strict limits on what they can say about their clients, whose every utterance is treated as presumptively classified. 

    "All I can do is try and protect my client's rights to every extent I can and try and hold the government to their burden to provide a fair and transparent justice system and to actually mean it," Bormann said. 

    Mohammed and his co-defendants were first arraigned on the U.S. base in Cuba in June 2008. The case quickly bogged down in pretrial motions and was put on hold as Obama sought to move the case to the federal court in New York. 

    But members of Congress balked and blocked the administration from transferring prisoners from the base to the mainland. That prevented the closure of the prison, where the U.S. still holds 169 prisoners. 

    "There is a consensus now ... that military commissions have a narrow but critical role in our counterterrorism and justice system," said Brig. Gen. Mark Martins, a Harvard Law School classmate of Obama's who was appointed chief prosecutor last year. 

    Mohammed confessed to military authorities that he planned or carried out about 30 plots around the world. He admitted personally killing Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl and said he conceived the plot to blow up a trans-Atlantic flight by would-be shoe-bomber Richard Reid in 2001. Mohammed was captured in 2003 in Pakistan. 

    Roth, who will be part of a human rights contingent observing Saturday's arraignment at Guantanamo, said the prosecution can work around the ban on coerced testimony, perhaps even unwittingly, by introducing classified summaries of intelligence to support their case. 

    Even with the changes, the defense lawyers say the commissions are anything but fair. They complain that their mail is improperly reviewed by the military, interfering with attorney-client privilege, that they aren't given enough resources to investigate cases the government spent years building, that too many hearings are still held in secret and that they are barred from disclosing anything their clients tell them. 

    "You can take a $5 mule and put a $10,000 saddle on it and call it reformed," said Navy Cmdr. Walter Ruiz, a military lawyer for Mustafa Ahmad al-Hawsawi. "You still have a $5 mule; it just has a fancy saddle."

    © 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    Comment

    Show more
    Explore related topics: military, guantanamo, al-qaida
  • 4
    May
    2012
    3:14pm, EDT

    Effects of misconduct threaten war efforts, Defense Secretary Panetta warns

    By Jeff Black, msnbc.com

    Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta on Friday said America is succeeding in Afghanistan, but warned that enemies are looking for new ways to inflict damage.

    "In particular, they have sought to take advantage of a series of troubling incidents involving misconduct on the part of American troops," he said in a speech at Fort Benning, Georgia. "These days, it takes only seconds for one picture to suddenly become an international headline."

    Panetta addressed about 1,300 soldiers from the 3rd Infrantry Division's 3rd Heavy Brigade Combat Team.


    Follow @msnbc_us

     

    Relations between the U.S. and Afghanistan have been strained by several recent incidents, specifically the burning of Muslim holy books at a U.S. base and the massacre of 17 civilians, including children, allegedly by Staff Sgt. Robert Bales, who is imprisoned at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, awaiting trial in the killings. In addition, American troops have been videotaped urinating on the bodies of Afghan militants and shown in photographs posing with the body parts of dead insurgents.

    "I know these incidents represent a very, very small percentage of the great work that our men and women do every day across the world," Panetta said, "but these incidents concern me — and all of the Service Chiefs — because they show a lack of judgment, a lack of professionalism, and a lack of leadership on the part of some of our men and women in uniform."

    “While these are seemingly isolated events by a few bad apples,” Michael Smith, a professor of communications at La Salle University in Pennsylvania told msnbc.com, “they may come to symbolize America to the Afghan population. If this becomes the case, our mission is doomed and the lives of our troops at greater risk.”

    Earlier this week, President Barack Obama made a surprise visit to Afghanistan, where he signed an agreement that spells out a winding down of the war as well as a longtime commitment to staying there.

    The Strategic Partnership Agreement, which was nearly two years in the making, was described by the President as a historic moment for Afghanistan and the U.S. NBC's Atia Abawi reports.

    Though no specifics on the number of troops who will remain in an advisory capacity, perhaps for a decade, were announced, the agreement pledges support after 88,000 combat forces leave Afghanistan in 2014 after what will be 13 years of war.

    Related: Troops returning home to strained veterans-affairs system

    In the meantime, the United States has said it is committed to stabilizing the Afghan government in the face of a messy insurgency from the Taliban, which hours after Obama’s visit launched a suicide car bomb attack that killed seven people in an a compound housing hundreds of westerners. 

    Related: Extreme war stresses to blame in Marine urination video?

    According to Anthony H. Cordesman of the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington and a former Defense Department intelligence assessment director, concerted communications campaigns to build up the images of American troops and the war effort started at the beginning of the Afghan conflict. The campaigns got a whole new emphasis in 2009 when a leaked report by U.S. and NATO commander Gen. Stanley McChrystal bluntly stated that without more forces and a new counterinsurgency strategy in Afghanistan, failure was likely. The report also said the Afghan government was riddled with corruption.

    “Similarly, there has been a consistent effort to provide sensitivity and cultural training to U.S. troops, trying to make them aware trying to make them aware how Afghans see the world and Afghan values,” Cordesman said.

    In insurgency campaigns — in Afghanistan’s case the Taliban trying to wrest control from the NATO-backed Afghan government — how civilians perceive each side in a conflict is key to cooperation during the war as well as stability afterward, Cordesman pointed out.

    Two Americans have been killed following days of protesting over the recent burning of the Quran at a NATO military base. NBC's Atia Abawi reports.

    “The history, almost regardless of who does this," he said, "is that very often you get the cultural values wrong. You can’t communicate as well as a movement that is local.”

    Speaking to the troops is useful, Cordesman said, but it is not a way of having a large impact on what the Afghans think about Americans in the short run. The Quran burning was a particularly egregious episode culturally — it sparked weeks of violent protests — while urinating on bodies and posing with photographs could be viewed as an act of revenge, which Afghans understand, Cordesman said.

    While such incidents are damaging, in the end it will be support for the Afghan government that will allow the United States to claim victory in Afghanistan, Cordesman said.

    “It’s not support for us that counts,” he said. “It’s support for them that makes transition to any kind of strategic victory possible.”

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • Neo-Nazi who killed family described as 'cruel,' 'controlling'
    • Student left in cell for 4 days files $20M claim against DEA
    • Video: Edwards' daughter breaks down in court
    • Judge: Prosecutor's rejection of gay juror 'shocking'
    • Desperately seeking Sango for African refugee
    • George Zimmerman's old Myspace page includes slurs against Mexicans

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

    348 comments

    As stated in this article, it is only a very small percentage of troops that actually participate in wrong behavior!!! We should be proud of these young men and women who are willing to lay down their lives for our great country!!!! I seriouly think the problem is that this soldiers have been on  …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: afghanistan, military, president-obama, public-relations, leon-panetta, fort-benning-georgia
  • 2
    May
    2012
    5:37pm, EDT

    Parents at US air base in Germany warned of child predator

    By Jeff Black, msnbc.com

    Parents who live at a U.S. air base in Germany were warned Wednesday to be extra vigilant with their kids because a child predator may be in their midst, Stars and Stripes reported.

    Two reported cases of child molestation and one attempted kidnapping took place near base housing in the Kaiserslautern area, some 20 miles south of Frankfurt, where Ramstein Air Base is located, it said.

    Some parents said they were so disturbed by the news that they don’t let their children alone to even walk a dog or take out the trash.



    Follow @msnbc_us

    A delay in publicly releasing details of the incidents drew a crowd of angry parents to a town hall meeting with Air Force officials to discuss child safety on Wednesday, according to the paper.

    “I have three children; I’m so angry right now, my voice is shaking,” one parent said, according to Stars and Stripes.

    The first alleged child molestation was reported in January, though it had taken place last August. Eleven days later, an attempted child abduction led authorities to launch a child safety campaign. Still, the Air Force did not supply details of the cases to people on the base.

    One parent said she first heard of an incident involving a child, without any detail, on Facebook last winter.

    Air Force officials, according to Stars and Stripes, said they withheld details about the cases in an effort to obtain more information about the suspect from victims and to draw him in.

    The last case of alleged child molestation took place in early April and was reported April 24. That's when Air Force officials began releasing more details of the cases and meeting with service families, according to Stars and Stripes.

    The description of the suspect in all three cases was similar, Air Force officials told the paper. He was described as a white male in his mid-20s with blue eyes, brown hair cut in military-style. He wore Army camouflage pants and a tan and green T-shirt.

    In response to the cases, officials at the base have issued new rules saying that children aged 5 and 6 could no longer play outside unattended or walk to school without a parent or caretaker.

    The base has also set up a special tip line for people to report suspicious activity.

    “We are aggressively working to resolve these threats and are using all of our available resources to track down those responsible,” an alert on the base’s website said.

    Officials with Ramstein Air Base could not immediately be reached by msnbc.com

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • George Zimmerman's old Myspace page includes slurs against Mexicans
    • Chicago pays $45 million in 3 years to settle complaints against cops
    • Maryland court finds pit bulls are 'inherently dangerous'
    • Video: Obama describes raid that killed bin Laden
    • NJ mom arrested after allegedly taking daughter, 5, tanning

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

    1 comment

    Sure sounds like we have an ALLEGEDLY straight serviceman that likes "play" with little kids. He may think it's fun and OK but it is One Foolish Idea! Perps ALWAYS make a mistake and are caught.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: crime, military, germany, ramstein-air-base
  • 2
    May
    2012
    2:03pm, EDT

    In Egypt, chaos is pinned on military's incompetence

    Str / AP

    Protesters clash with Egyptian military outside the Defense Ministry in Cairo, Egypt on Wednesday, May 2, 2012.

    By Ayman Mohyeldin , NBC News correspondent

    News Analysis

    With three weeks before presidential elections and less than 60 days before a new civilian president is sworn into office, Egypt is once again witnessing a round of violence that critics and activists say has become emblematic of the country's chaotic transition.

    The latest flare-up came on Wednesday when armed supporters of Egypt's military rulers – many believed be hired thugs – attacked predominantly Islamist anti-government protesters outside the Defense Ministry in Cairo, setting off clashes that left 11 dead.
     
    But Wednesday's clashes should not be dismissed as merely a conflagration of violence between rival political groupings. It has a deeper meaning – a deep mistrust between citizens and the military that continues to grow and jeopardize the country’s future.


    Military mismanagement
    The frustrations many Egyptians have with the military stem from its failure to chart a transparent and civilian-led transition to democracy. Instead, since former President Hosni Mubarak’s ouster in February 2011, the military has tried to play the role of steward, guardian and, at times, driver of the revolution much to the dismay of the country's revolutionary youth.


    PHOTO BLOG: Several dead in Cairo as protesters attacked

    The military's shortcomings have been coupled with its mismanagement of the country's day-to-day affairs through successive military-appointed civilian cabinets which hold very little power and even less credibility. The result is that few in Egypt can say the quality of their life has improved in the transition period.

    Meanwhile, Egypt's parliament has yet to find itself as the people's voice. A committee tasked with writing a new constitution is in disarray. The powerful Presidential Elections Commission has been operating, at best, in a questionable manner with how it manages the upcoming presidential race. And Egypt's judiciary continues to struggle in asserting itself over the legality of the state’s actions and the military's decisions.

    However, Wednesday's violence has shifted the attention away from these issues and the candidates and refocused it on the military's mismanagement.

    Presidential hopefuls have suspended campaign activities; effectively curbing their time spent selling voters on their ideas and vision for the country's future.

    Even Egypt's first presidential debate, which was scheduled to be televised nationwide Thursday, has been delayed, and could potentially be cancelled. The debate would be a first in the Arab world.

    ‘Two steps forward, one step back’
    Such developments bolster the characterization of Egypt's transition as "two steps forward, one step back.” Every time there is a silver lining that gets people hopeful about a new Egypt, they are almost immediately undermined by either a deliberate or unintentional miscalculation by the ruling military council.

    And the increasing fear among Egyptians is that the military may ruin what is left of an already deficient process on its way out of power. That’s why the next 60 days are critical in Egypt and must be watched ever so closely.
     

    29 comments

    Another example of Obama's foreign policy blunders. The "Brotherhood" is already talking about scrapping the peace treaty with Israel and they've cut off the gas to Israel. Obama's anti-Israel agenda rolls onward...

    Show more
    Explore related topics: egypt, violence, military, revolution, featured, ayman-mohyeldin
  • 1
    May
    2012
    9:17pm, EDT

    Transcript of President Barack Obama's speech from Bagram Air Base, May 2

    President Barack Obama's remarks on the war in Afghanistan

    As Prepared for Delivery

    Bagram Air Base, Afghanistan

    May 2, 2012 local time

    Good evening from Bagram Air Base. This outpost is more than seven thousand miles from home, but for over a decade it has been close to our hearts. Because here, in Afghanistan, more than half a million of our sons and daughters have sacrificed to protect our country.

    Today, I signed an historic agreement between the United States and Afghanistan that defines a new kind of relationship between our countries - a future in which Afghans are responsible for the security of their nation, and we build an equal partnership between two sovereign states; a future in which the war ends, and a new chapter begins.

    Tonight, I'd like to speak to you about this transition. But first, let us remember why we came here. It was here, in Afghanistan, where Osama bin Laden established a safe-haven for his terrorist organization. It was here, in Afghanistan, where al-Qaida brought new recruits, trained them, and plotted acts of terror. It was here, from within these borders, that al-Qaida launched the attacks that killed nearly 3,000 innocent men, women and children.

    And so, ten years ago, the United States and our allies went to war to make sure that al-Qaida could never again use this country to launch attacks against us. Despite initial success, for a number of reasons, this war has taken longer than most anticipated. In 2002, bin Laden and his lieutenants escaped across the border and established safe-havens in Pakistan. America spent nearly eight years fighting a different war in Iraq. And al-Qaida's extremist allies within the Taliban have waged a brutal insurgency.

    But over the last three years, the tide has turned. We broke the Taliban's momentum. We've built strong Afghan Security Forces. We devastated al-Qaida's leadership, taking out over 20 of their top 30 leaders. And one year ago, from a base here in Afghanistan, our troops launched the operation that killed Osama bin Laden. The goal that I set - to defeat al-Qaida, and deny it a chance to rebuild - is within reach.

    Still, there will be difficult days ahead. The enormous sacrifices of our men and women are not over. But tonight, I'd like to tell you how we will complete our mission and end the war in Afghanistan.

    First, we have begun a transition to Afghan responsibility for security. Already, nearly half the Afghan people live in places where Afghan Security Forces are moving into the lead. This month, at a NATO Summit in Chicago, our coalition will set a goal for Afghan forces to be in the lead for combat operations across the country next year. International troops will continue to train, advise and assist the Afghans, and fight alongside them when needed. But we will shift into a support role as Afghans step forward.

    As we do, our troops will be coming home. Last year, we removed 10,000 U.S. troops from Afghanistan. Another 23,000 will leave by the end of the summer. After that, reductions will continue at a steady pace, with more of our troops coming home. And as our coalition agreed, by the end of 2014 the Afghans will be fully responsible for the security of their country.

    Second, we are training Afghan Security Forces to get the job done. Those forces have surged, and will peak at 352,000 this year. The Afghans will sustain that level for three years, and then reduce the size of their military. And in Chicago, we will endorse a proposal to support a strong and sustainable long-term Afghan force.

    Third, we are building an enduring partnership. The agreement we signed today sends a clear message to the Afghan people: as you stand up, you will not stand alone. It establishes the basis of our cooperation over the next decade, including shared commitments to combat terrorism and strengthen democratic institutions. It supports Afghan efforts to advance development and dignity for their people. And it includes Afghan commitments to transparency and accountability, and to protect the human rights of all Afghans - men and women, boys and girls.

    Within this framework, we will work with the Afghans to determine what support they need to accomplish two narrow security missions beyond 2014: counter-terrorism and continued training. But we will not build permanent bases in this country, nor will we be patrolling its cities and mountains. That will be the job of the Afghan people.

    Fourth, we are pursuing a negotiated peace. In coordination with the Afghan government, my Administration has been in direct discussions with the Taliban. We have made it clear that they can be a part of this future if they break with al Qaeda, renounce violence, and abide by Afghan laws. Many members of the Taliban - from foot soldiers to leaders - have indicated an interest in reconciliation. A path to peace is now set before them. Those who refuse to walk it will face strong Afghan Security Forces, backed by the United States and our allies.

    Fifth, we are building a global consensus to support peace and stability in South Asia. In Chicago, the international community will express support for this plan, and for Afghanistan's future. I have made it clear to Afghanistan's neighbor - Pakistan - that it can and should be an equal partner in this process in a way that respects Pakistan's sovereignty, interests, and democratic institutions. In pursuit of a durable peace, America has no designs beyond an end to al-Qaida safe-havens, and respect for Afghan sovereignty.

    As we move forward, some people will ask why we need a firm timeline. The answer is clear: our goal is not to build a country in America's image, or to eradicate every vestige of the Taliban. These objectives would require many more years, many more dollars, and many more American lives. Our goal is to destroy al-Qaida, and we are on a path to do exactly that. Afghans want to fully assert their sovereignty and build a lasting peace. That requires a clear timeline to wind down the war.

    Others will ask why we don't leave immediately. That answer is also clear: we must give Afghanistan the opportunity to stabilize. Otherwise, our gains could be lost, and al-Qaida could establish itself once more. And as Commander-in-Chief, I refuse to let that happen.

    I recognize that many Americans are tired of war. As President, nothing is more wrenching than signing a letter to a family of the fallen, or looking in the eyes of a child who will grow up without a mother or father. I will not keep Americans in harm's way a single day longer than is absolutely required for our national security. But we must finish the job we started in Afghanistan, and end this war responsibly.

    My fellow Americans, we have traveled through more than a decade under the dark cloud of war. Yet here, in the predawn darkness of Afghanistan, we can see the light of a new day on the horizon. The Iraq War is over. The number of our troops in harm's way has been cut in half, and more will be coming home soon. We have a clear path to fulfill our mission in Afghanistan, while delivering justice to al-Qaida.

    This future is only within reach because of our men and women in uniform. Time and again, they have answered the call to serve in distant and dangerous places. In an age when so many institutions have come up short, these Americans stood tall. They met their responsibilities to one another, and the flag they serve under. I just met with some of them, and told them that as Commander-in-Chief, I could not be prouder. In their faces, we see what is best in ourselves and our country.

    Our soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines, coast guardsmen and civilians in Afghanistan have done their duty. Now, we must summon that same sense of common purpose. We must give our veterans and military families the support they deserve, and the opportunities they have earned. And we must redouble our efforts to build a nation worthy of their sacrifice. 

    As we emerge from a decade of conflict abroad and economic crisis at home, it is time to renew America. An America where our children live free from fear, and have the skills to claim their dreams. A united America of grit and resilience, where sunlight glistens off soaring new towers in downtown Manhattan, and we build our future as one people, as one nation.

    Here, in Afghanistan, Americans answered the call to defend their fellow citizens and uphold human dignity. Today, we recall the fallen, and those who suffer wounds seen and unseen. But through dark days we have drawn strength from their example, and the ideals that have guided our nation and lit the world: a belief that all people are created equal, and deserve the freedom to determine their destiny.

    That is the light that guides us still. This time of war began in Afghanistan, and this is where it will end. With faith in each other and our eyes fixed on the future, let us finish the work at hand, and forge a just and lasting peace. May God bless our troops. And may God bless the United States of America.

    4 comments

    Thank you, President Obama! Thank you, U.S. military! Thank you, Afghan government! I do believe the very best principles are being applied here, and it is most reassuring.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: afghanistan, barack-obama, military, war, speech
Older posts

Browse

  • featured,
  • world-news,
  • europe,
  • syria,
  • afghanistan,
  • china,
  • iran,
  • pakistan,
  • russia,
  • middle-east,
  • israel,
  • north-korea,
  • africa,
  • military,
  • britain,
  • france,
  • environment,
  • egypt,
  • uk,
  • london,
  • protest,
  • al-qaida,
  • assad,
  • nuclear,
  • terrorism,
  • mexico,
  • japan,
  • italy,
  • iraq,
  • economy,
  • crime,
  • human-rights,
  • asia,
  • us,
  • taliban,
  • nato,
  • election
Also
Advertise | AdChoices

Jeff Black

I'm a senior writer and editor at msnbc.com working on the news team.

Archives

  • 2012
    • May (293)
    • April (404)
    • March (427)
    • February (347)
    • January (283)
  • 2011
    • December (357)
    • November (3)

Most Commented

  • Lockerbie bomber al-Megrahi dies in Libya after long battle with cancer (698)
  • 800-year-old tree at Vancouver Island park falls to illegal loggers (491)
  • Greeks withdraw $894 million in a day: Is this beginning of a run on banks? (528)
  • In China, English teaching is a whites-only club (414)
  • Beer-swilling bride sparks controversy in New Zealand (290)
  • Queen Sofia of Spain snubs Queen Elizabeth II in diplomatic spat over Gibraltar (317)
  • Obama, NATO leaders chart path out of Afghanistan (361)
  • Iran hangs 'Israel spy' over nuclear scientist killing (523)

Other blogs

  • The Body Odd
  • Cosmic Log
  • Red Tape Chronicles
  • PhotoBlog
  • Gadgetbox
  • Technolog
  • Daryl Cagle's Cartoon Blog
  • Open Channel
  • InGame

msnbc.com top stories

3147,10
© 2012 msnbc.com
  • World news on msnbc.com
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Help
  • Site map
  • Careers
  • Terms & Conditions
  • MSN Privacy
  • Legal
  • Advertise
Advertise | AdChoices